Institute for Natural Resources

Haddad T, Wright D, Dailey M, Klarin P, Marra J, Dana R, Revell D.  2005.  The Tools of the Oregon Coastal Atlas.

Abbott MR, Bloomer S, Hanna S, Lubchenco J, Malouf RE, Rasmussen J, Rumrill S.  2005.  Scientific Review by the Marine Science Advisory Panel of Oregon University System Scientists of the US Commission on Ocean Policy: Preliminary Report for Governor Kulongoski's Oregon Response.

Abbott MR, Bloomer S, Hanna S, Lubchenco J, Malouf RE, Rasmussen J, Rumrill S.  2005.  Scientific Review by the Marine Science Advisory Panel of Oregon University System Scientists of the US Commission on Ocean Policy: Preliminary Report for Governor Kulongoski's Oregon Response.

Environmental Law Institute, Institute for Natural Resources, NatureServe, Resources for the Future, Cambridge Systematics, Inc..  2011.  A Practitioner’s Handbook: Optimizing Conservation and Improving Mitigation Through the Use of Progressive Approaches.

Achterman G, Davis-Born R, Gaines L, Rolston I.  2005.  Oregon Coastal Community Water Supply Assessment.

Gaines L, Walsh K, Risien J.  2011.  The Oregon Coastal and Marine Data Network Workshop, June 6-7, 2011.

Environmental Law Institute, NatureServe, Institute for Natural Resources, Resources for the Future, Cambridge Systematics, Inc..  2010.  Optimizing Conservation and Improving Mitigation Cost/Benefit: Task 1: Literature Review and Interviews.

Environmental Law Institute, NatureServe, Institute for Natural Resources, Resources for the Future, Cambridge Systematics, Inc..  2011.  Optimizing Conservation and Improving Mitigation Cost/Benefit: Task 3: Comparison of the Ecological and Economic Outcomes of Traditional vs. Programmatic, Multi-Resource Based Approach.

Environmental Law Institute, NatureServe, Institute for Natural Resources, Resources for the Future, Cambridge Systematics, Inc..  2010.  Optimizing Conservation and Improving Mitigation Cost/Benefit: Task 2: Evaluation and Selection of Approaches.

Olander L, Characklis GW, Comer PJ, Effron M, Gunn J, Holmes T, Johnston RJ, Kagan JS, Lehman W, Loomis J et al..  2017.  Data and Modeling Infrastructure for National Integration of Ecosystem Services into Decision Making: Expert Summaries. National Ecosystem Services Partnership Working Paper.

Olander L, Characklis GW, Comer PJ, Effron M, Gunn J, Holmes T, Johnston RJ, Kagan JS, Lehman W, Loomis J et al..  2017.  Data and Modeling Infrastructure for National Integration of Ecosystem Services into Decision Making: Expert Summaries. National Ecosystem Services Partnership Working Paper.

Cushman K, Huff R, Lau H, Dewey R, Russell M.  2020.  Conservation Assessment for Fungi Included in Forest Service Region 6 Sensitive and BLM Oregon and Washington Special Status Species Programs. Interagency Special Status and Sensitive Species Conservation Assessment. :45pp.

Cushman K, Huff R, Lau H, Dewey R, Russell M.  2020.  Conservation Assessment for Fungi Included in Forest Service Region 6 Sensitive and BLM Oregon and Washington Special Status Species Programs: Appendix III. Table of species, their classification, and important traits. Interagency Special Status and Sensitive Species Conservation Assessment.

Cushman K, Huff R, Lau H, Dewey R, Russell M.  2020.  Conservation Assessment for Fungi Included in Forest Service Region 6 Sensitive and BLM Oregon and Washington Special Status Species Programs: Appendix V. Descriptions of Ecosystem Scale Forest Mycology Experiments. Interagency Special Status and Sensitive Species Conservation Assessment. :16pp.

Cushman K, Huff R, Lau H, Dewey R, Russell M.  2020.  Conservation Assessment for Fungi Included in Forest Service Region 6 Sensitive and BLM Oregon and Washington Special Status Species Programs: Appendix IV. Table of species and results from the scientific literature. Interagency Special Status and Sensitive Species Conservation Assessment.

Achterman G, Davis-Born R, Gaines L, Orscheln N, Rice B, Yaden D.  2006.  Climate Change Outreach Project Final Report.

Institute for Natural Resources, EcoAdapt.  2016.  Available Science Assessment Project: Prescribed Fire and Climate Change in Northwest National Forests. Report to the Department of the Interior’s Northwest Climate Science Center.

Gregg R.M., Reynier W., Gaines L, Behan J.  2018.  Available Science Assessment Process (ASAP): Sea Level Rise in the Pacific Northwest and Northern California. Report to the Northwest Climate Adaptation Science Center.

Kagan JS, Borsuk M, Calder R, Creutzburg MK, Mason S, Olander L, Plantinga A.J., Robinson C.  2019.  Assessing Ecosystem Service Benefits from Military Installations. Strategic Environmental Research and Development Program, Project Number: RC18-1604.

Root HT, McCune M, McCune B.  2013.  Wind Farm Potential is Higher in Prime Habitat for Uncommon Soil Crust Lichens. Ecological Processes. 2:10:8.

Vano JA, Kim JB, Rupp DE, Mote PW.  2015.  Selecting climate change scenarios using impact-relevant sensitivities. Geophysical Research Letters. 42:5516-5525.

Kanaga MK, Ryel RJ, Mock KE, Pfrender ME.  2008.  Quantitative-genetic variation in morphological and physiological traits within a quaking aspen ( Populus tremuloides ) population. Canadian Journal of Forest Research. 38(6):1690-1694.

Robinson CJ, Margerum RD, Koontz TM, Moseley C, Lurie SD.  2011.  Policy-Level Collaboratives for Environmental Management at the Regional Scale: Lessons and Challenges From Australia and the United States. Society & Natural Resources. 24(8):849-859.

Kanaga MK, Latta LC, Mock KE, Ryel RJ, Lindroth RL, Pfrender ME.  2009.  Plant genotypic diversity and environmental stress interact to negatively affect arthropod community diversity. Arthropod-Plant Interactions. 3(4):249-258.

Sproles EA, Roth TR, Nolin AW.  2017.  Future snow? A spatial-probabilistic assessment of the extraordinarily low snowpacks of 2014 and 2015 in the Oregon Cascades The Cryosphere. 11:10.