Export 312 results:
Author Title [ Type(Desc)] Year
Filters: Filter is   [Clear All Filters]
Report
Institute for Natural Resources.  2005.  2004-2005 Annual Report.
View PDF
Institute for Natural Resources.  2016.  2015 Year in Review. INR Report.
View Flipbook
O’Brien S, Gaines L.  2011.  Adding climate change to the mix: using climate futures in conservation planning for Oregon’s oak-dominated habitats - Eugene, Oregon April 26-27, 2011.
View PDF
Johnson RL, Steigerwald D, Cappaert M.  2002.  Analysis of Boater Pass Data on the Deschutes River.
View PDF
Behan J, Crawford S, Kleiner E.  2005.  Applying Systematic Evidence Reviews in Oregon Forest Policy: Opportunities and Challenges.
View PDF
Vickerman S, Kagan JS.  2014.  Assessing ecological integrity across jurisdictions and scales. Workshop Paper. :38.
View PDF
Kagan JS, Borsuk M, Calder R, Creutzburg MK, Mason S, Olander L, Plantinga A.J., Robinson C.  2019.  Assessing Ecosystem Service Benefits from Military Installations. Strategic Environmental Research and Development Program, Project Number: RC18-1604.
View PDF
Gregg R.M., Reynier W., Gaines L, Behan J.  2018.  Available Science Assessment Process (ASAP): Sea Level Rise in the Pacific Northwest and Northern California. Report to the Northwest Climate Adaptation Science Center.
View PDF
Institute for Natural Resources, EcoAdapt.  2016.  Available Science Assessment Project: Prescribed Fire and Climate Change in Northwest National Forests. Report to the Department of the Interior’s Northwest Climate Science Center.
Olander L, Johnston RJ, Tallis H, Kagan JS, Maguire L, Polasky S, Urban D, Boyd JE, Wainger L, Palmer M.  2015.  Best Practices for Integrating Ecosystem Services into Federal Decision Making.
View PDF
Lurie SD, Duncan S, McCune M.  2012.  Bringing the River Back: Working with Landowners on Willamette River Restoration.
View PDF
Burcsu T, Halofsky JS, Bisrat SA, Christopher TA, Creutzburg MK, Henderson EB, Hemstrom MA.  2012.  Chapter 2: Dynamic Vegetation Modeling of Forest, Woodland, Shrubland, and Grassland Vegetation Communities in the Pacific Northwest and Southwest Regions of the United States.
View Report
Christy JA, Wagner DH.  2014.  Checklist of Mosses of Oregon. Oregon Biodiversity Information Center, Institute for Natural Resources. :40.
View PDF
Christy JA, Wagner DH, Kofranek D.  2019.  Checklist of Mosses of Oregon, 2019. Institute for Natural Resources, Portland, Oregon. :39.
View PDF
Christy J, Wagner DH, Kofranek D.  2022.  Checklist of Mosses of Oregon, 2022. Institute for Natural Resources, Portland, Oregon. :44.
View PDF.
Kagan JS, Christy JA, Murray MP, Titus JA.  2004.  Classification of Native Vegetation of Oregon.
View PDF
Kagan JS, Brunner RL, Christy JA.  2019.  Classification of native vegetation of Oregon - 2019. Institute for Natural Resources, Portland State University, Portland, OR. :109pp.
View Report and Table
Buechling A, Alverson ER, Kertis J, Fitzpatrick G.  2008.  Classification of Oak Vegetation in the Willamette Valley. :71.
Achterman G, Davis-Born R, Gaines L, Orscheln N, Rice B, Yaden D.  2006.  Climate Change Outreach Project Final Report.
View PDF
Wentworth A.  2014.  Coastal Water Supply: Are Distribution Systems Ready for the Future? INR Student Report.
View PDF
Ferguson LB.  2016.  Collaborative science-stakeholder engagement: An annotated reference guide for scientific engagement with natural-resources practicioners. (ORESU-H16-001):17.
Institute for Natural Resources, Columbia River Gorge Commission.  2008.  Columbia River Gorge Vital Signs Indicators Project.
View PDF
Cushman K, Huff R, Lau H, Dewey R, Russell M.  2020.  Conservation Assessment for Fungi Included in Forest Service Region 6 Sensitive and BLM Oregon and Washington Special Status Species Programs: Appendix V. Descriptions of Ecosystem Scale Forest Mycology Experiments. Interagency Special Status and Sensitive Species Conservation Assessment. :16pp.
View PDF.
Cushman K, Huff R, Lau H, Dewey R, Russell M.  2020.  Conservation Assessment for Fungi Included in Forest Service Region 6 Sensitive and BLM Oregon and Washington Special Status Species Programs: Appendix IV. Table of species and results from the scientific literature. Interagency Special Status and Sensitive Species Conservation Assessment.
Download spreadsheet.
Cushman K, Huff R, Lau H, Dewey R, Russell M.  2020.  Conservation Assessment for Fungi Included in Forest Service Region 6 Sensitive and BLM Oregon and Washington Special Status Species Programs. Interagency Special Status and Sensitive Species Conservation Assessment. :45pp.
View PDF.

Pages